Comments on: This Browser’s Gonna BOLT You Off Your Feet

By: SDA

SDA — Mon, 22 Feb 2010 12:17:07 +0000

youtube screen doesnt fit properly!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

i really need youtube !
my samsung jets media player fails to stream youtube!
bolt is the only alternative i can look up to
pls help me wid da prob!

all works well itz loads plays!
but da upper half is behind the players frame n not visible!
HEEEELLLLLLLLLLLLLLLPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP

By: PS3 Slim 2009

PS3 Slim 2009 — Sat, 24 Oct 2009 13:57:02 +0000

Sweet, gotta check this out. Hopefully faster than Opera on my phone atm. I

By: mining stock

mining stock — Sun, 02 Aug 2009 05:57:51 +0000

Well I have been testing this out for about a week now, and find it a little buggy, but it is fast. Not sure if I am going to make this a solid add for me quite yet. Al

By: Al

Al — Fri, 17 Jul 2009 10:52:09 +0000

I am hoping browsers get better. I keep up grading my PDA’s hoping more resources improve its performance. A better browser the better for me. Especially on my Nokia N95 (I know old now) but it works for me.

By: Diamonds

Diamonds — Mon, 13 Jul 2009 14:50:17 +0000

Interesting

By: Paul5867

Paul5867 — Sat, 18 Apr 2009 20:32:42 +0000

Just some other thoughts. BOLT was clearly not designed for a phone that costs hundreds of dollars, and anyone willing to pay that much shouldn’t be above paying for a high-quality browser. There are other Windows Mobile phones for which BOLT might be a better match, such as the Blackjack (or Blackjack II) which does not have a touchscreen and has two soft keys for accessing the corresponding buttons within BOLT, but even then Skyfire is a better option. BOLT was simply not made for Windows Mobile devices and there should be no notion that it should compete with the more powerful browsers that can be used on Windows Mobile, especially since Internet Explorer Mobile 6 includes Flash support, which is pretty far above the capabilities of any Java-based browser.

By: Paul5867

Paul5867 — Sat, 18 Apr 2009 19:41:02 +0000

“So it seems that the developers of ThunderHawk, a really great subscription-based browser, are behind the BOLT browser as well. I couldn’t confirm this but considering that the browser was communicating with this server would suggest so. Not a bad start.”

Bitstream is the company that made Thunderhawk. Bitstream is the company that made BOLT. They’re both made by the same company, so DUH!!! they’re behind BOLT.

Did you also not see on their website (http://boltbrowser.com) that they say that BOLT is based off of the Thunderhawk browser!?: “Built on Bitstream’s ThunderHawk browsing technology, BOLT is the result of 5+ years experience developing mobile browsers…”

Do your research before you publish something.

By: BOLT Browser to be released as Public Beta Monday!

BOLT Browser to be released as Public Beta Monday! — Sun, 15 Feb 2009 22:24:49 +0000

[...] been in private beta, but the access codes have been circling throughout the internet like found here. Cambridge, Mass. and Barcelona, Spain – February 16, 2009 – As the world’s wireless and [...]